Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788911›Full record

ArticleInternational review of research in developmental disabilities2021

Two Sides of the Same Coin: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives on Factors Affecting Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices for Children with Autism in Elementary Schools.

Kaitlyn Ahlers, Maria L Hugh, Lindsay Frederick, Jill Locke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International review of research in developmental disabilities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Iterative redesign of a caregiver-mediated intervention for use in educational settings.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaitlyn AhlersDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-8140
Maria L HughDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Lindsay FrederickDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Jill LockeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.

Funding

Staff and School Factors Affecting Implementation of ASD Interventions in SchoolsK01MH100199 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LOCKE, JILL J · 2014 to 2017
$698k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH100199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schools are the primary setting in which autistic youth receive intervention, yet fidelity to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in schools varies. Fidelity is an important metric to determine whether educators are delivering EBPs as designed, and there are many different factors that predict fidelity to EBP implementation. This qualitative study used Domitrovich and colleagues' multi-level framework to explore individual- and school-level factors that facilitated or impeded implementation of EBPs for autistic students in schools. Semi-structured interviews with 26 special education teachers with high and low fidelity implementation of three EBPs for ASD (discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and visual schedules) and 26 administrators in schools explored multiple stakeholders' perspectives of the implementation process. Thematic analysis revealed factors from the individual- to the macro-level that influenced teachers' implementation fidelity. Many of these factors are malleable and represent targets for implementation strategies to improve the implementation of EBPs for autistic students in schools.

Indexed as

Autism spectrum disorderEvidence-based practicesFidelityImplementationInterventionsSchools

Identifiers

PMID41788911
PMCPMC12959904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.