ArticleInternational review of research in developmental disabilities2021
Two Sides of the Same Coin: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives on Factors Affecting Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices for Children with Autism in Elementary Schools.
Article in International review of research in developmental disabilities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nursing managers' perspectives on facilitators of and barriers to evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Testing a Theory of Implementation Leadership and Climate Across Autism Evidence-Based Interventions of Varying Complexity.Behavior therapy · 2022Article
- Iterative redesign of a caregiver-mediated intervention for use in educational settings.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schools are the primary setting in which autistic youth receive intervention, yet fidelity to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in schools varies. Fidelity is an important metric to determine whether educators are delivering EBPs as designed, and there are many different factors that predict fidelity to EBP implementation. This qualitative study used Domitrovich and colleagues' multi-level framework to explore individual- and school-level factors that facilitated or impeded implementation of EBPs for autistic students in schools. Semi-structured interviews with 26 special education teachers with high and low fidelity implementation of three EBPs for ASD (discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and visual schedules) and 26 administrators in schools explored multiple stakeholders' perspectives of the implementation process. Thematic analysis revealed factors from the individual- to the macro-level that influenced teachers' implementation fidelity. Many of these factors are malleable and represent targets for implementation strategies to improve the implementation of EBPs for autistic students in schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.