Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788900›Full record

ArticleClinical optometry2026

Sex Differences in Preferred Under-Correction of Contact Lenses and Their Potential Relevance to Presbyopia Management.

Masahiko Ayaki, Akiko Hanyuda, Kazuno Negishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical optometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masahiko AyakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-0164
Akiko HanyudaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuno NegishiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-9810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine sex differences in preferred refraction for presbyopic correction in daily life, determined by the power of prescribed contact lenses. Patients and methods: Near add power and preferred contact lens power were examined in participants aged from 20 to 79 years who were divided into three age groups (20-39, 40-59, and 60-79 years). The difference (Δ) in lens power (preferred corrective power of contact lens - full correction power) was compared between both sexes in each age group. Regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between Δ lens power and ocular parameters. Results: A total of 768 men and 2314 women were enrolled in the study. Sex differences were prominent in the 40-59 year age group; namely Δ lens power was larger ( Conclusion: The current results revealed sex differences in the preferred power of contact lenses for presbyopic correction for optimal daily living. The magnitude of under-correction was significantly greater in women than men aged 40 to 59 years.

Indexed as

accommodationnear add powernear visionpresbyopiasex differences

Identifiers

PMID41788900
PMCPMC12956865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.