ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Multi-sensor fusion outperforms single indicators for fatigue prediction in university soccer players: a machine learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Collegiate football players face unique challenges balancing academic and athletic demands, yet research on multi-sensor training load monitoring for this population remains limited. Objective: To evaluate multi-sensor wearable devices for training load monitoring and fatigue prediction in collegiate football players. Methods: Forty-eight male collegiate football players were monitored over 12 weeks using GPS devices, heart rate monitors, and subjective questionnaires. External and internal load indicators were collected during 536 training sessions and 24 matches. Fatigue status was defined using countermovement jump, heart rate variability, wellness scores, and RPE. XGBoost, random forest, and logistic regression models were developed and validated. Results: Strong correlations existed between external and internal load indicators (Player Load vs. TRIMP: r = 0.81). The XGBoost model achieved optimal performance (AUC = 0.895), significantly outperforming single-indicator models. Wellness score (18.5%), ACWR (16.2%), and morning HRV (13.8%) were the most important predictive features. Position-specific load patterns were observed, with midfielders covering greatest distances and forwards showing highest sprint outputs. Conclusion: Multi-sensor fusion combined with machine learning (XGBoost, AUC = 0.895) significantly outperforms single-indicator models for fatigue prediction in university soccer players, with wellness score, ACWR, and morning HRV identified as the most important predictive features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.