ArticleBehavioral ecology and sociobiology2026
How distinct are sleep sites from active sites across habitat types in lizards?
Article in Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep poses constraints, such as increased vulnerability to predators, that can lead to differences in the use of habitat components across the diel cycle. However, very few studies have systematically evaluated site use of animals across both active and sleep phases. We quantified site use during the active and sleep phases in 412 individuals of eight species (six genera) of agamid lizards, from four habitat types (arboreal, semi-arboreal, rupicolous and ground). Sleep sites differed for five out of the eight species, in all habitat types except rupicolous. Semi-arboreal and arboreal lizards slept on narrower and more compliant perches, likely to detect and avoid predators, whereas ground-dwelling lizards slept in sheltered sites that probably afford a stable thermo-hydric environment. For most species, sleep sites differed from active sites in only a few characteristics, indicating that lizards respond to the potential costs of sleep while being constrained by their morpho-functional abilities. We found equivocal pattens of lower variability of sleep sites compared to active sites, which may be due to low variability in perch options or low costs of sleep in some habitat types. This study provides a large-scale test of diel shifts in habitat use and highlights the need to integrate sleep microhabitat use into ecological and conservation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.