Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788862›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology and sociobiology2026

How distinct are sleep sites from active sites across habitat types in lizards?

Nitya Prakash Mohanty, Anbazhagan Abinesh, Saumitra Dhere, Maria Thaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nitya Prakash MohantyCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-6483
Anbazhagan AbineshCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0337-7666
Saumitra DhereCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0009-0007-0689-9319
Maria ThakerCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6019-2639

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/I/19/2/504639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep poses constraints, such as increased vulnerability to predators, that can lead to differences in the use of habitat components across the diel cycle. However, very few studies have systematically evaluated site use of animals across both active and sleep phases. We quantified site use during the active and sleep phases in 412 individuals of eight species (six genera) of agamid lizards, from four habitat types (arboreal, semi-arboreal, rupicolous and ground). Sleep sites differed for five out of the eight species, in all habitat types except rupicolous. Semi-arboreal and arboreal lizards slept on narrower and more compliant perches, likely to detect and avoid predators, whereas ground-dwelling lizards slept in sheltered sites that probably afford a stable thermo-hydric environment. For most species, sleep sites differed from active sites in only a few characteristics, indicating that lizards respond to the potential costs of sleep while being constrained by their morpho-functional abilities. We found equivocal pattens of lower variability of sleep sites compared to active sites, which may be due to low variability in perch options or low costs of sleep in some habitat types. This study provides a large-scale test of diel shifts in habitat use and highlights the need to integrate sleep microhabitat use into ecological and conservation research.

Indexed as

AgamidaeDiel shiftDiurnal-nocturnalPerchReptileSite selection

Identifiers

PMID41788862
PMCPMC7618821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.