Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788839›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2026

Milking dynamics following individual quarter dry-off in Holstein cows in an automatic milking system.

Clara Ibarguren, Jason Lombard, Juan Velez, Constanza Hernandez-Gotelli, Pablo Pinedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clara IbargurenDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Jason LombardDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences; AgNext, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Juan VelezAurora Organic Farms, Platteville, CO 80651.
Constanza Hernandez-GotelliDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Pablo PinedoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual quarter dry-off (QDO) is a targeted management strategy used to address persistent IMI that lead to chronic subclinical mastitis, as well as cases of clinical mastitis that are recurrent or unresponsive to treatment. Although the interest in the use of individual QDO as a non-antimicrobial strategy for mastitis control is growing, the impact of this management on subsequent milk production has not been widely explored. Moreover, detailed information on the individual performance of the remaining functional quarters following QDO is scarce. The objective of this observational study was to investigate the effect of lactational QDO following clinical mastitis on short-term milk yield in the remaining individual quarters. This retrospective study was conducted in a commercial dairy farm located in northeast Colorado, equipped with an automatic milking system. The analysis included 114 multiparous cows with one quarter dried off through abrupt cessation of milking following unresponsive clinical mastitis therapy. For comparison, one healthy control cow was matched to each affected cow based on DIM and parity number. Individual quarter milk yield of the remaining functional quarters and from control cows was collected for each milking visit from the on-farm management software and summed as a daily value per quarter for the 30 d following QDO. The herd average DIM at the peak of lactation (68 DIM) was considered to categorize the study cows based on their DIM at QDO into prepeak and postpeak groups. All the analyses were conducted separately for these 2 stage of lactation groups and cows were also categorized based on their dry quarter location (DQL). Least squares means (SE) for daily average milk yield per functional quarter and per cow up to 30 d post QDO were calculated and compared among DQL groups (including matched control cows) using ANOVA for repeated measures analysis, with cow ID as the repeated statement, with compound symmetry selected as the covariance structure. Multivariable models included DQL as explanatory variable of interest and DIM at QDO and calving season as potential covariates. In addition, milk yield curves up to 30 d post-QDO were built for milk yield per DQL using daily LSM calculated by repeated measures analysis. Cow-level milk yield was also compared between DQL groups, including unaffected control cows using

Identifiers

PMID41788839
PMCPMC12958166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.