Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788828›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2026

Evaluation of propidium monoazide for 16S ribosomal RNA metabarcoding assessment of microbial communities in 60-day ripened raw goat milk cheese.

Sintia Naianne Pereira Feitoza, Laiorayne Araújo de Lima, Carla Aparecida Soares Saraiva, Weslla da Silva Dias, Ana Beatriz Azevedo de Medeiros, Artur Cezar de Carvalho Fernandes, Marcos Bryan Heinemann, Fernando Nogueira de Souza, Nivea Regina Oliveira Felisberto, Mateus Lacerda Pereira Lemos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sintia Naianne Pereira FeitozaLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.
Laiorayne Araújo de LimaLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.
Carla Aparecida Soares SaraivaLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.
Weslla da Silva DiasLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.
Ana Beatriz Azevedo de MedeirosLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.
Artur Cezar de Carvalho FernandesLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.
Marcos Bryan HeinemannDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo-SP, Brasil.
Fernando Nogueira de SouzaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo-SP, Brasil.
Nivea Regina Oliveira FelisbertoEmbrapa Caprinos e Ovinos, Campina Grande-PB, Brasil.
Mateus Lacerda Pereira LemosLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.
Antônio Silvio do EgitoEmbrapa Caprinos e Ovinos, Campina Grande-PB, Brasil.
Celso José Bruno de OliveiraLaboratório de Avaliação de Produtos de Origem Animal (LAPOA), Departamento de Zootecnia (DZ), Centro de Ciências Agrárias (CCA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Paraíba, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cheese ripening is a complex microbial process marked by significant shifts in microbial composition. Considering that propidium monoazide (PMA) depletes DNA from nonviable cells, we hypothesized that PMA treatment of cheese samples could affect the microbiota characterization of 60-d-ripened raw goat curd cheese by 16S rRNA metabarcoding sequencing. After ripening, PMA-treated and nontreated (control) samples from the same cheese units were processed for DNA extraction, library preparation, and 16S rRNA metabarcoding sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq platform. Downstream bioinformatic analyses for microbial diversity assessment were performed using QIIME 2 and the phyloseq package in R. Statistical analyses included permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), Wilcoxon tests, and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). No significant differences were observed in either α or β diversity metrics between PMA-treated and nontreated samples. However, PMA treatment significantly reduced the abundance of farm environment-associated

Identifiers

PMID41788828
PMCPMC12958163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.