ArticleJDS communications2026
Exploratory analysis of associations between postpartum body condition changes measured by an automated 3-dimensional camera and reproductive outcomes measured by in-line milk progesterone analysis.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate the associations of postpartum BCS changes, as predicted by automatic monitoring using 3-dimensional (3D) camera technology after calving, with milk yield and reproductive outcomes assessed both from in-line milk progesterone analysis and conventional methods in Holstein dairy cows in a retrospective observational study. Cows calving in a commercial farm during a whole year (n = 123; 53 primiparous and 70 multiparous) were automatically evaluated for BCS with a 3D camera (DeLaval Body Condition Scoring system) daily on a 5-point scale up to 120 DIM and retrospectively classified into tertiles based on BCS change from calving to 30 DIM. The resulting groups had high (HI), intermediate (IN), and low (LO) BCS change. Milk yield and milking frequency were collected daily from the automatic milking system (VMS V310, DeLaval), which also automatically evaluated milk progesterone concentration every 2 to 3 d on average. These data were used to characterize luteal activity, with progesterone concentrations peaking during luteal phases and reaching a nadir around estrus events, thus allowing identification of the resumption of cyclicity. Pregnancy outcomes were evaluated up to 200 DIM with logistic regressions and time-to-event data with Cox's proportional hazard models. Continuous data were analyzed with ANOVA, with repeated measures mixed models when appropriate. The models included the effects of BCS tertile and parity. Body condition score loss averaged -0.47, -0.30, and -0.09 for HI, IN, and LO, respectively, ranging from -0.78 to -0.36 in HI, from -0.35 to -0.25 in IN, and from -0.24 to 0.41 in LO. Cows with minimal BCS loss (LO) were thinner (BCS = 3.23 ± 0.29) at calving than cows with greater BCS loss (HI and IN, BCS = 3.38 ± 0.25 and 3.37 ± 0.23, respectively). The BCS nadir was lower in HI compared with IN and LO, although the time to the nadir did not differ. The HI cows tended to have later commencement of luteal activity (i.e., DIM of the first of at least 2 consecutive samples with milk progesterone ≥5 ng/mL; +8 d vs. IN and LO), calculated based on progesterone profiles, but a similar percentage of cows (∼95% overall) resumed ovarian cyclicity before the end of voluntary waiting period (75 DIM). The proportion of cows pregnant at the first artificial insemination (AI) did not differ, but LO cows tended to have increased likelihood of pregnancy at the second AI compared with IN. The cumulative proportion of pregnant cows at the first and second AI tended to be greater in LO compared with HI and IN, and the proportion of pregnant cows up to 200 DIM was greater in LO. Compared with LO, the HI and IN cows had reduced hazard of pregnancy up to 200 DIM. Milk yield was 4 and 3 kg/d lower in LO compared with HI and IN. Automated BCS and progesterone monitoring showed that greater BCS loss in the first 28 DIM was associated with delayed cyclicity and reduced reproductive performance, whereas minimal loss was associated with greater reproductive success but lower yield.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.