ArticleJDS communications2026
Heart rate and heart rate variability of dairy cows with or without local anesthesia.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart rate variability analysis provides valuable insights into autonomic nervous system function but remains minimally explored in veterinary anesthesiology, particularly regarding its relationship with low-dose caudal epidural anesthesia in cattle. This study employed a crossover design to determine whether epidural lidocaine administration (4 mL of 2% solution) affects cardiac autonomic regulation compared with physiological saline in 8 healthy Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Interbeat intervals were measured at baseline and for 240 min following epidural injection and cardiac autonomic activity-related parameters of heart rate variability (heart rate, root mean square of successive differences, high-frequency component, and ratio of low-frequency and high-frequency components) were calculated. Area under the curve for the first 240 min after the treatment and time to return to baseline were used to evaluate overall treatment effects on cardiac autonomic activity. Results revealed no differences in the area under the curve values for any parameters of heart rate variability between lidocaine and saline epidural interventions throughout the observation period, with comparable recovery times to baseline values between treatments. These findings suggest that sacrococcygeal epidural anesthesia did not detectably affect cardiac autonomic regulation in dairy cows under the conditions of this study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.