Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788755›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Efficacy of intravenous amisulpride and ondansetron in preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumour surgery: A randomised non-inferiority trial.

Sreeja Ravindranath, Ajay Prasad Hrishi, Manikandan Sethuraman, C S Ranganatha Praveen, Krishnakumar Kesavapisharady

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sreeja RavindranathDivision of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8220-1493
Ajay Prasad HrishiDivision of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-0543
Manikandan SethuramanDivision of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-551X
C S Ranganatha PraveenDivision of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0183-8596
Krishnakumar KesavapisharadyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-4497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures are at a high risk of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Amisulpride, a dopamine (D2, D3) receptor antagonist, has been recently approved for intravenous use in antiemesis and has demonstrated safety and efficacy in managing PONV in non-neurosurgical settings. We hypothesised that amisulpride would be non-inferior to ondansetron in preventing PONV. Methods: Adult patients scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy for tumour surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either intravenous amisulpride (5 mg) or intravenous ondansetron (4 mg) intra-operatively, administered 30 minutes before skin closure. Patients were then assessed for PONV in the post-operative intensive care unit. The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included nausea severity, the need for rescue antiemetic medications, and treatment-related adverse events. Incidence of PONV was compared using the Chi-square test. Secondary outcomes like severity of nausea, rescue medications, and adverse events were tested using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. Non-inferiority of amisulpride to ondansetron was assessed using the pre-specified absolute non-inferiority margin of 20%. Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the final analysis. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the amisulpride group (22% and 8%) compared to the ondansetron group (36% and 8%) ( Conclusion: A single intra-operative intravenous dose of amisulpride (5 mg) at the end of the surgery was found to be non-inferior to 4 mg intravenous ondansetron in reducing the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

Indexed as

AmisulprideanaesthesiacraniotomyintravenousneurosurgeryondansetronPONVpost-operative nausea and vomitingsupratentorial tumour surgery

Identifiers

PMID41788755
PMCPMC12959520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.