Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788744›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Development and evaluation of predictive performance of "organ failure assessment by ratio score" to predict sepsis mortality in Indian intensive care unit patients: An observational study.

Vinay Gandhi Mukkelli, Puneet Khanna, Bikash R Ray, Rahul Kumar Anand, Vimi Rewari, Ganga Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vinay Gandhi MukkelliDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6738-3167
Puneet KhannaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9243-9963
Bikash R RayDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1461-1518
Rahul Kumar AnandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7852-1231
Vimi RewariDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-1367
Ganga PrasadDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1178-4643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Sepsis is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), requiring reliable scoring systems to predict outcomes and guide management. Existing traditional scoring systems inadequately capture sepsis complexity. This study developed the Organ Failure Assessment by Ratio (OFAR) score to improve ICU mortality prediction in sepsis patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in the ICUs of a tertiary care centre between January 2021 to December 2023 and included adult patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria. Demographic data, ICU mortality, and six composite variables were collected: bilirubin-to-albumin ratio, pulse oximetric saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (SpO Results: The OFAR score showed greater discriminatory power with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78 than quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) (AUC: 0.70) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score II (APACHE II) (AUC: 0.73) and was comparable to Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA) (AUC: 0.76). With a cut-off score of 51.6, OFAR score demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.7% and a specificity of 72.1%. Conclusion: The OFAR score provides higher predictive power for ICU mortality than qSOFA and APACHE II in our study population, raising its potential as an alternative risk stratification scoring system in sepsis patients. Additional external validation is required to confirm its generalisability across diverse populations.

Indexed as

APACHE IIintensive care unitsmortalityorgan dysfunction scoresprognosisqSOFArisk assessmentsepsisshockSOFA score

Identifiers

PMID41788744
PMCPMC12959522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.