ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
The glioblastoma GBMdrug1000 dataset resource provides directions for future small molecule drug discovery.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We previously created a glioblastoma (GBM) DrugBank containing curated information on chemical structure, molecular target activity, and chemical biology for 500 compounds. This study expands the dataset to 1103 compounds, including molecular bioactivity, cellular dose-response, CRISPR-Cas9 knockout data, potential toxicity, and links to clinical trials and patents. Methods: We gathered information from literature on compounds and models, allowing direct comparisons between compounds, their targets, and biological effects. We also included our own dose-response and drug-induced gene expression data across various glioblastoma cell culture models. Compounds were curated for their effect in preclinical GBM models, and these parameters were projected onto an ECFP_6-based UMAP visualization. Results: The visualization facilitates comparisons of bioactivities, CRISPR-Cas9 effects in GBM, and potential toxicity in nontransformed models. The analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of GBM drug discovery, emphasizing the trade-offs between effectiveness, toxicity, and specificity. It also provides insights for optimizing targeting based on compound structure and characteristics, targets, and putative toxicity through cheminformatic or experimental approaches. Conclusions: The GBMdrug1000 dataset is a public state-of-the-art resource for drug discovery and cheminformatics analysis, complemented by patent information and links to clinical trial data. This curated resource forms a framework for future prioritization of targets or their combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.