ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Comparative efficacy and safety of anticoagulant, combination, and antiplatelet therapies in patients with intracardiac thrombus: a real-world retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracardiac thrombus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, optimal antithrombotic strategies remain uncertain. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens in patients with intracardiac thrombus. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with intracardiac thrombus were enrolled at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Logistic regression assessed the association between antithrombotic therapies and thrombus dissolution, while Cox regression evaluated the association with all-cause mortality. Thromboembolic events and clinically related major bleeding (CRMB) events were compared across treatment groups using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier curves depicted one-year cumulative incidence, with subgroup analyses presented using forest plots. Results: A total of 214 patients were included, of whom 26 received antiplatelet therapy, 118 anticoagulant therapy, and 70 combination therapy. Compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of thrombus dissolution in the Model 1 (aOR 3.56, 95% CI 1.16-11.20), although this association was attenyated in Model 2 (aOR 2.52, 95% CI: 0.72-9.01). Combination therapy showed a non-significant trend toward improved thrombus dissolution in both Models 1 (aOR 2.40, 95% CI 0.77-7.37) and Model 2 (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 0.66-6.66). For all-cause mortality, anticoagulant therapy was consistently associated with a significantly lower risk compared with antiplatelet therapy in both adjusted models (Model 1: aHR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.79; Model 2: aHR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.78). Compared with antiplatelet therapy, combination therapy was associated with reduced all-cause mortality in the Model 1 (aHR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.90) but not Model 2 (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.06-1.75). Combination therapy showed a non-significant trend toward improved thrombus dissolution or all-cause mortality compared with anticoagulant therapy. Conclusion: In patients with intracardiac thrombus, anticoagulant monotherapy was associated with a significantly lower one-year all-cause mortality compared with antiplatelet therapy, whereas its effect on thrombus dissolution was attenuated after full adjustment, potentially reflecting thrombus-related heterogeneity. Combination therapy did not confer additional efficacy or safety benefits over antiplatelet or anticoagulant monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.