Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788731›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Comparative efficacy and safety of anticoagulant, combination, and antiplatelet therapies in patients with intracardiac thrombus: a real-world retrospective study.

Chenxiao Jiang, Xinyu Wang, Baoyan Wang, Xin Chen, Biao Xu, Jie Ni, Dujuan Sha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chenxiao Jiang *Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xinyu Wang *Department of General Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Baoyan Wang *Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Biao XuDepartment of Cardiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jie NiDepartment of General Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Dujuan ShaDepartment of General Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intracardiac thrombus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, optimal antithrombotic strategies remain uncertain. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens in patients with intracardiac thrombus. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with intracardiac thrombus were enrolled at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Logistic regression assessed the association between antithrombotic therapies and thrombus dissolution, while Cox regression evaluated the association with all-cause mortality. Thromboembolic events and clinically related major bleeding (CRMB) events were compared across treatment groups using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier curves depicted one-year cumulative incidence, with subgroup analyses presented using forest plots. Results: A total of 214 patients were included, of whom 26 received antiplatelet therapy, 118 anticoagulant therapy, and 70 combination therapy. Compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of thrombus dissolution in the Model 1 (aOR 3.56, 95% CI 1.16-11.20), although this association was attenyated in Model 2 (aOR 2.52, 95% CI: 0.72-9.01). Combination therapy showed a non-significant trend toward improved thrombus dissolution in both Models 1 (aOR 2.40, 95% CI 0.77-7.37) and Model 2 (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 0.66-6.66). For all-cause mortality, anticoagulant therapy was consistently associated with a significantly lower risk compared with antiplatelet therapy in both adjusted models (Model 1: aHR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.79; Model 2: aHR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.78). Compared with antiplatelet therapy, combination therapy was associated with reduced all-cause mortality in the Model 1 (aHR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.90) but not Model 2 (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.06-1.75). Combination therapy showed a non-significant trend toward improved thrombus dissolution or all-cause mortality compared with anticoagulant therapy. Conclusion: In patients with intracardiac thrombus, anticoagulant monotherapy was associated with a significantly lower one-year all-cause mortality compared with antiplatelet therapy, whereas its effect on thrombus dissolution was attenuated after full adjustment, potentially reflecting thrombus-related heterogeneity. Combination therapy did not confer additional efficacy or safety benefits over antiplatelet or anticoagulant monotherapy.

Indexed as

anticoagulant therapyantiplatelet therapycombination therapyefficacyintracardiac thrombussafety

Identifiers

PMID41788731
PMCPMC12956654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.