ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Eating behaviors in transmasculine and transfeminine adults assessed by the three factor eating questionnaire.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people have unique influences on their eating and nutrition-related behaviors, which increase their risk for disordered eating. Understanding eating behaviors in this population may help healthcare providers screen for and treat eating pathologies. Few studies have evaluated their eating behavior traits using validated measurements. Methods: This secondary cross-sectional analysis evaluated eating behavior traits of transmasculine (TM) and transfeminine (TF) adults on testosterone-based and estradiol-based gender-affirming hormone therapy, respectively, for >1 year. The Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was self-administered to assess the traits of cognitive restraint, disinhibition, and susceptibility to hunger. Linear regression models were used to estimate mean TFEQ scores to account for sample age variability, as well as estimate associations between BMI and BF% with TFEQ scores by gender group adjusted for age. Results: Of 16 participants in the TM group, actual mean scores (SD) were cognitive restraint 7.8 (4.3), disinhibition 6.7 (4.4), and susceptibility to hunger 5.9 (3.8). The actual mean scores (SD) of the 30 TF participants were cognitive restraint 10.2 (4.9), disinhibition 6.0 (3.9), and susceptibility to hunger 4.0 (3.6). The groups had similar actual TFEQ scores, though after adjustment for age, TF had a higher predicted mean cognitive restraint score while TM had a higher predicted mean susceptibility to hunger score. Eating behavior traits were generally positively associated with BMI and BF%. For TM, associations were positive between susceptibility to hunger for BMI and BF% and between disinhibition and BMI; meanwhile, for TF, associations were positive between cognitive restraint and BMI and BF%. Discussion: TM and TF had similar eating behavior traits assessed by the TFEQ that resemble TFEQ profiles previously reported for cisgender women but higher than previously reported for cisgender men. Associations of eating behavior traits with anthropometric measures of adiposity were generally positive, suggesting that TGD people with overweight or obesity may experience greater cognitive restraint, disinhibition, and susceptibility to hunger than TGD people with normal weight. Future larger studies should assess the relationships of these behaviors with other influences, such as disordered eating and gender minority stress, to further understand eating behaviors in TGD populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.