Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788615›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2026

Decommissioning retired hemodialysis machines in Dutch hospitals: strategies and sustainability considerations.

Vincent Peters, Niels Verhoeven, Wendy van der Valk, Dennis Hulsen, Karin Gerritsen, Dennis van der Schrier, Thijs de Graaf, Frank van der Sande, Bram Kamps, Wim de Jong and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vincent PetersDepartment of Information Systems and Operations Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9777-7777
Niels VerhoevenDepartment of Information Systems and Operations Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Wendy van der ValkDepartment of Information Systems and Operations Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Dennis HulsenDepartment of Medical Physics, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Karin GerritsenDepartment of Nephrology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dennis van der SchrierDepartment of Medical Technology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Thijs de GraafDepartment of MIT Medical Technology, Nephrology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frank van der SandeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bram KampsDepartment of ICMT - Medical Technology, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim de JongDepartment of Medical Physics, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Constantijn KoningsDepartment of Nephrology, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Barend SchoutenDepartment of Nephrology, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter KotankoRenal Research Institute, New York City, NY, USA.
Len UsvyatRenal Research Institute, New York City, NY, USA.
John LarkinRenal Research Institute, New York City, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The decommissioning of hemodialysis machines, particularly in the context of transitioning from hemodialysis to hemodiafiltration, remains understudied despite its importance for sustainable healthcare. This study evaluates decommissioning strategies for hemodialysis machines used by Dutch hospitals, analyzing the economic, social and environmental consequences. Methods: A qualitative, exploratory study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 15 professionals from 11 Dutch hospitals that retired hemodialysis machines. The analysis focused on understanding decommissioning strategies and their economic, social and environmental consequences. Results: Five decommissioning strategies were identified: disposal, donation, reuse, sale and recycling/trade-in. Substantial variability and limited formalization in these strategies were observed across and within hospitals. Economic consequences included repair costs, depreciation and resale value. Social consequences were important, yet typically secondary. Environmental consequences were recognized but rarely formalized, although indirect environmental benefits from economically driven repair activities were acknowledged. Conclusions: Decommissioning strategies for hemodialysis machines in Dutch hospitals do not use formalized guidelines and are still predominantly shaped by economic drivers. The recognition that each decommissioning strategy entails distinct economic, social and environmental consequences highlights the need for more balanced decision-making. By embedding sustainability principles into hospital policies and standardizing decommissioning procedures, hospitals can move toward more circular and responsible dialysis care.

Indexed as

decommissioning strategyhemodiafiltrationhemodialysishemodialysis machinesustainability

Identifiers

PMID41788615
PMCPMC12957914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.