ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Clinical Outcomes and Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Corrective High Tibial and Distal Femoral Osteotomy.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High tibial osteotomies (HTOs) and distal femoral osteotomies (DFOs) may be used for a variety of knee pathologies including unicompartmental cartilage disorders and ligamentous instability. A novel instrumentation system for osteotomies utilizing 3-dimensional patient-specific instrumentation (3D PSI) cutting guides has been recently described; however, there is limited reporting on the clinical outcomes and accuracy of this system. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and accuracy of correction of a 3D PSI osteotomy system. It was hypothesized that patients would have significant improvements in patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores and that ≥90% of patients would have coronal and sagittal alignment within 10% and 3°, respectively, of the planned correction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent opening wedge (oW) or closing wedge (cW) HTO or DFO utilizing a 3D PSI system from October 2020 to June 2022 were reviewed. Mechanical medial tibial width ratio (mMTWr) and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively on full-length standing alignment films and lateral radiographs of the knee, respectively. The absolute difference between the planned correction and postoperative measurements was calculated. PROs (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]; Lysholm; and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] Pain, WOMAC Stiffness, WOMAC Physical Function, and WOMAC Total) were obtained from all patients at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. All data are reported as means unless otherwise noted. Results: A total of 23 cases (16 oW HTO, 4 oW DFO, 2 cW DFO, and 1 combined cW HTO + oW DFO) were included at a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Using a Bonferroni-corrected Conclusion: This study found that patients who underwent corrective HTO or DFO using 3D PSI had significant improvements in PROs; there was good accuracy of coronal correction with 88% of patients falling within 10% of the planned final mMTWr and moderate accuracy with 67% of patients falling within 3° of the planned final PTS. These findings demonstrate that osteotomy utilizing 3D PSI can lead to clinically meaningful improvements in patient function with high accuracy of planned correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.