ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
The influence of prior brief occlusion therapy on the outcome of later amblyopia treatment in cats.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Certain multi-centered randomized clinical trials of conventional treatment of children with amblyopia revealed greater improvement of the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye in patients that were never treated compared to those with a prior history of unsuccessful therapy. As a step toward a possible explanation for this phenomenon, this study investigated the influence of early prior brief treatment of amblyopia on the success of later treatment. Methods: These experiments were conducted using the well documented feline model of deprivation amblyopia. Behavioral visual acuity thresholds were made by use of a jumping stand and a two-alternative forced choice procedure. Results: Six amblyopic kittens that received a very brief period of occlusion of the non-amblyopic eye prior to a much longer subsequent period of such occlusion exhibited less recovery of the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye (group mean 1.44 c/deg) compared to 7 control amblyopic animals that received only the second period of treatment (group mean 2.57 c/deg). Conclusion: The results from this animal model indicate that prior visual history may impact the capacity for neural plasticity and thus the potential for recovery from amblyopia. From a clinical standpoint the data suggest adoption of a 3-E protocol to optimize the efficiency of occlusion therapy for amblyopia in which occlusion is initiated Early, applied in an Exact manner, and be Enduring in length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.