ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Evoked potentials in stroke rehabilitation: current applications, emerging technologies, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evoked potentials (EPs) are increasingly explored as objective neurophysiological biomarkers to complement scale-based assessment in stroke rehabilitation. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and event-related potentials (ERPs) for monitoring recovery and guiding therapy. We first outline the physiological basis and stroke-relevant features of each modality, then synthesize data on how EP measures relate to motor, sensory, balance, cognitive and language outcomes, with particular emphasis on longitudinal changes during rehabilitation and responses to specific interventions, including neuromuscular electrical stimulation, robot-assisted training and non-invasive brain stimulation. Emerging applications such as perturbation-evoked cortical responses for postural control, EP-based brain-computer interfaces and EP-guided or closed-loop neuromodulation are discussed, together with advances in high-density recordings, connectivity analysis, and machine-learning-based multimodal prediction models. Finally, we highlight key methodological and practical challenges-protocol heterogeneity, small single-center studies, limited trial evidence, feasibility constraints and gaps in clinical integration-and propose priorities for standardization and translational research. Overall, EPs hold substantial promise as pathway-specific, temporally precise biomarkers to enable more mechanism-informed and individualized stroke rehabilitation monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.