Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Fibrotic scarring prevents optic nerve regeneration despite preserved axonal growth potential in adult killifish.

Julie D De Schutter, Luca Masin, Anyi Zhang, Lieve Moons, Steven Bergmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Killiverse: an interactive multi-omics web resource for killifish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie D De SchutterDivision of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Luca MasinDivision of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anyi ZhangDivision of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lieve Moons *Division of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven Bergmans *Division of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult mammals exhibit limited regenerative capacity in the central nervous system (CNS), leading to irreversible deficits following injury or disease. Effective strategies to restore CNS function remain lacking. For retinal disorders, whole-eye transplantation has emerged as a promising approach, yet reinnervation of visual brain targets remains a major challenge. Here, we evaluated the killifish-a teleost fish species displaying robust regenerative capacities during young adulthood and mammalian-like regenerative traits at old age-as a translational model for whole-eye transplantation. We analyzed axonal regeneration following complete optic nerve transection (cONT), an injury paradigm relevant to whole-eye transplantation, in both young adult and aged individuals. Unexpectedly, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in adult killifish failed to reinnervate their brain target after cONT, in contrast to regeneration-competent zebrafish. Despite this failure, RGCs retained high intrinsic growth potential, evidenced by aberrant axonal projections within the retina. The inability to reestablish brain connectivity, combined with inflammation and intrinsic vulnerability, likely underlies the severe RGC loss (~75%) in both age groups. We identified the formation of a dense, collagen-rich gliofibrotic scar at the lesion site as a major barrier to axonal regeneration. Intriguingly, partial optic nerve transection, which markedly reduced scar formation, improved RGC survival, facilitated robust axonal regeneration and restored target reinnervation. Together, these findings establish the killifish as a powerful model to study scar-mediated inhibition of CNS regeneration, with important implications for advancing CNS repair strategies, including whole-eye transplantation.

Indexed as

axonal regenerationaxon misguidancefibrosisinflammationkillifishoptic nerve transectionretinal ganglion cellscarring

Identifiers

PMID41788542
PMCPMC12956645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.