Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788527›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The development and psychometric evaluation of vaccine hesitancy and perception scale towards COVID-19 vaccination (VHAPS-CV19).

Amanda L Meiklejohn, Mintesnot T Teni, Megan Kalinowski, Michael Poirier, Divya S Subramaniam

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda L MeiklejohnDepartment of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Mintesnot T TeniDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Megan KalinowskiDepartment of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Michael PoirierDepartment of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Divya S SubramaniamDepartment of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy measurement instrument. Literature demonstrated a theme of seven constructs to include in the instrument: benefits, cost, confidence, convenience, complacency, risk, and perception. Face and content validity was performed using subject matter experts, self-identified COVID-19 hesitant, and non-hesitant individuals. The pilot survey data were collected from the end of December 2022 to May 2023 via an online convenient sample (

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPsychometricsVaccination HesitancyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 VaccinescoronavirusCOVID-19instrument developmentvaccine hesitancyvaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID41788527
PMCPMC12957071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.