ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
From policy to practice and vice versa: a cross-sectional study of healthcare workers' perspectives on safeguarding public health service access for displaced populations in Iran.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is severely off track. Iran hosts the world's largest migrant and refugee population, but sanctions, inflation, and workforce migration have strained its capacity. Since the attitudes of service providers influence whether inclusive policies are translated into practice, this study explores frontline staff perspectives on access to public health services for non-citizens in one of Tehran's largest public health networks. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among staff in three public health centers that serve migrant and refugee populations. The questionnaire assessed five Likert scale outcomes: support for separate centers, shared user fees, prioritization of citizens under conditions of scarcity, equal service provision, and preference for working with citizens. Demographic variables included age, sex, years of experience, and role (clinical vs. non-clinical). Items were analyzed descriptively; subgroup comparisons were conducted using two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Of approximately 150 eligible healthcare workers, 87 provided complete responses. Agreement with prioritizing citizens was highest at 93.1% (median 5). Support for equal service provision was lowest, with 56.3% of participants expressing disagreement (median 2). A preference for working with citizens was endorsed by 61.9% of the respondents (median 4) and differed by age, experience, and role, with younger, less-experienced, and clinical staff reporting stronger preferences (all Conclusion: Healthcare workers' perspectives can serve as a rapid, low-burden proxy indicator for equitable service delivery. In this exploratory study, workers favored citizen prioritization and fee-based models under conditions of scarcity, with the lowest support expressed for equal access for non-citizens; these preferences were strongest among younger and clinical staff. Adapted service delivery models, targeted training, and clear operational guidance are needed to support equitable access in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.