ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026
Assessment of soluble PD-L1 in septic shock in relation to immunosuppressive phenotypes.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nano-Enabled Microfluidic Platforms for Functional Immunomonitoring in Pediatric Sepsis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Septic shock triggers a complex immune response characterized by the coexistence of hyperinflammation and immunosuppression, the latter being a major driver of ICU-acquired infections and increased mortality. Currently, the most established biomarkers for assessing sepsis-induced immunosuppression rely on flow cytometry-a technique not universally available in clinical practice. In contrast, soluble biomarkers are, in principle, easier to measure. Although assays for soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) are not yet standardized, sPD-L1 concentrations may represent a pragmatic alternative, given the putative role of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in immunosuppressive pathways during sepsis. In this study, we investigated sPD-L1 in relation to established cellular markers of immunosuppression in a cohort of 161 patients with septic shock. sPD-L1 levels were measured using the ELLA microfluidic platform during the first week of ICU admission. We assessed their association with clinical outcomes and explored the relationship between sPD-L1 and immunosuppressive profiles defined by low monocytic HLA-DR expression (mHLA-DR) and absolute lymphocyte count. Results: Upon admission, patients exhibited elevated sPD-L1 levels compared to healthy controls (medians: 179 vs. 54 pg/mL, p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between sPD-L1 levels and severity scores (SOFA, SAPS II). Elevated sPD-L1 was independently and significantly associated with increased mortality at both 28 and 90 days. Longitudinal analysis using K-means clustering revealed that the cluster with consistently highest sPD-L1 levels was associated with unfavorable outcomes. Overall, and at any single time point, sPD-L1 concentrations did not correlate with mHLA-DR expression or lymphopenia. However, the combined presence of high sPD-L1 and low mHLA-DR levels at the end of the first week identified a subgroup of patients with particularly poor clinical outcomes. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of sPD-L1 as a clinically relevant biomarker in the context of sepsis immunopathology. Further studies are warranted to elucidate its role in the mechanisms underlying sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Such insights could support the integration of sPD-L1 into multimodal biomarker panels for immune monitoring and risk stratification in patients with septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.