Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788483›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2026

Target-controlled infusion for analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.

Alessandro Zambianchi, Tommaso Pettenuzzo, Francesco Zarantonello, Domenico Ruggerini, Gianluca Lumetti, Lorenzo Beria, Giulia Aviani Fulvio, Nicola Rebellato, Giulia Ometto, Valentina Fincati and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alessandro ZambianchiDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Tommaso PettenuzzoDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Francesco ZarantonelloInstitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Domenico RuggeriniDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Gianluca LumettiDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Lorenzo BeriaDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giulia Aviani FulvioDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Nicola RebellatoDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giulia OmettoDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Valentina FincatiDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Mara BassiDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giulia MormandoDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Elisa PistollatoInstitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Arianna PeraltaInstitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Alessandro De CassaiDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Nicolò SellaDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Annalisa BoscoloDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Target-controlled infusion (TCI) is widely used for total intravenous anesthesia; however, its role in the intensive care unit (ICU) for analgesia and sedation remains insufficiently defined. We performed a scoping review to describe the existing evidence on the applications of TCI in critically ill adults. Methods: In accordance with a registered protocol (Open Science Framework, April 3, 2025), we systematically searched major databases for randomized and non-randomized studies evaluating TCI in the ICU. Eight independent reviewers conducted study screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Results: Thirty-three articles comprising 1,273 patients met the inclusion criteria, 1,142 1 patients receiving TCI-based analgosedation and 106 receiving conventional strategies. Reported indications for TCI-based analgosedation included postoperative ventilation, postoperative pain control, and procedures associated with discomfort and pain. Only four studies directly compared TCI-based to conventional analgosedation strategies. Overall, TCI was feasible, safe, and allowed precise titration of analgesia and sedation. Most studies were judged to have a moderate risk of bias. Conclusions: Available data suggest that TCI-based analgosedation in the ICU is feasible and safe in the short term. Most available data are descriptive or exploratory and robust comparative clinical benefit has not yet been demonstrated. Further high-quality research is therefore needed to validate existing pharmacological models for prolonged infusions and to compare TCI with standard analgosedation practices regarding safety and patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaDeliriumIntensive care unitMechanical ventilationSedationTarget-controlled infusion

Identifiers

PMID41788483
PMCPMC12934426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.