Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788469›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026

Appearance-based computer vision pipeline for multi-animal monitoring of canine activity, behavior and clinical observations.

Eline Eberhardt, Jef Plochaet, Tanguy Ophoff, Floris De Feyter, Sarah De Landtsheer, Greet Teuns, Maarten Vergauwen, Bianca Feyen, Toon Goedemé, Ivan Kopljar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eline Eberhardt *Non-Clinical Safety and Submissions, Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, J&J Innovative Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Jef Plochaet *Eavise- PSI, department of Electrical Engineering ESAT, KU Leuven, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.
Tanguy OphoffEavise- PSI, department of Electrical Engineering ESAT, KU Leuven, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.
Floris De FeyterEavise- PSI, department of Electrical Engineering ESAT, KU Leuven, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.
Sarah De LandtsheerScientific and In vivo Strategies, Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, J&J Innovative Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Greet TeunsGlobal Safety Pharmacology, Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, J&J Innovative Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Maarten VergauwenScientific and In vivo Strategies, Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, J&J Innovative Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Bianca FeyenNon-Clinical Safety and Submissions, Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, J&J Innovative Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Toon GoedeméEavise- PSI, department of Electrical Engineering ESAT, KU Leuven, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.
Ivan KopljarNon-Clinical Safety and Submissions, Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, J&J Innovative Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral monitoring of laboratory animals is essential for evaluating drug safety, yet existing assessments are typically limited to in-room observations by technicians. Here, we introduce our versatile AI model pipeline, composed of interconnected artificial neural networks that leverage end-to-end learning based solely on video-derived appearance features of canines. This non-invasive approach enables detailed mapping of activity, behavior and clinical signs at individual animal level under diverse conditions. To validate its real-world application, we conducted extensive field testing on hours of footage. Trained on a large, annotated dataset, our model can accurately multi-track up to three group-housed canines using color-coded reflective harnesses, achieving high re-identification accuracies (≥92.5%) and IDF1 scores up to 99.9%. AI-derived locomotor activity showed a strong correlation with accelerometer-based measurements (r = 0.965). Our AI model detects 11 behavior and clinical observation classes, with a mean class accuracy of 48% and individual accuracies up to 93%. As such, a detailed time-specific quantitative output is available for activity, mobility, pose, eating, drinking and specific clinical signs (ataxia, anxiety, circling, convulsions, head shaking, involuntary muscle movements, limping, limb stiff, vomiting). Our innovative approach brings holistic behavioral and health monitoring in canines closer to routine practice and contributes towards the 3Rs principles.

Indexed as

animal behaviorCNS effectscomputer visionlongitudinal behavioral assessmentpreclinical animal modelssafety pharmacologytoxicologyvideomonitoring

Identifiers

PMID41788469
PMCPMC12957207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.