ArticleJournal of food science and technology2026
Advancing Mediterranean food integrity: assessing a digital tool for consumer empowerment and traceability.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Mediterranean Diet is widely renowned for its benefits in promoting longevity and well-being. However, ensuring the authenticity and traceability of Mediterranean food products remains a significant challenge. To tackle this, the food industry must adopt transparent and reliable supply chain practices that includes leveraging innovative technologies, essential to meet consumer demands, enhance efficiency, and promote sustainability. This study aims to validate the feasibility of the Med Food TTHubs Consumer App ensuring that the digital solution meets the needs and expectations of the target audience facilitating consumer adoption. User perceptions were assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with 21 participants. SUS analysis showed an average score of 74.5, indicating the solution's acceptability fell short of good usability criteria. Notably, 66.7% found it acceptable (SUS Score ≥ 68), and 47.6% rated it as having good usability (SUS Score ≥ 80). TAM revealed a positive perception, showing potential acceptance and adoption. The acceptable Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.721 indicates internal consistency. This digital solution emerges as an encouraging tool to enhance transparency, traceability, and consumer empowerment in the food sector. Despite identified usability issues, its user-friendly interface and comprehensive information contribute to informed decision-making and healthier food choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.