Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788425›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

Geopolitics and public health: Europe under the shadow of the U.S. National Security Strategy.

Jonathan Cylus, Martin McKee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan CylusEuropean Observatory on Health Systems & Policies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.
Martin McKeeDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy marks a major shift toward a narrowly defined "America First" agenda with significant implications for Europe and its health systems. It reframes global public goods, including disease surveillance, migration governance, and climate action, as burdens rather than shared responsibilities, while prioritising hard power, economic nationalism, strict border control, and fossil fuel expansion. Europe is urged to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP and reduce regulatory and welfare commitments, thereby creating fiscal pressures that risk crowding out investment in health and social care. Its rhetoric on migration, culture, and declining birth rates aligns with and empowers far-right movements, potentially accelerating welfare retrenchment and undermining access to care for migrant and marginalised populations. This Viewpoint analyses the implications of the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy for public health and health systems in Europe, with particular attention to welfare, migration, climate, and multilateral cooperation. A weakened WHO, reduced U.S. multilateral engagement, and more transactional transatlantic relations threaten global health security. Europe must safeguard health systems, equity, and the multilateral global order.

Indexed as

EuropePopulismSecurityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41788425
PMCPMC12959303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.