Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788417›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

Best Evidence Summary for Postoperative Pain Management in Adult ICU Patients.

Jie An, Xiang An, Bei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie AnSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiang AnDepartment of Medicine, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-9256-0009
Bei LiSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify and summarize the best available evidence for postoperative pain management in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients to inform clinical practice. Methods: Using evidence-based nursing methodology, an evidence-based question on postoperative pain management in adult ICUs was formulated. A systematic literature search was conducted. The quality of included literature was appraised, and evidence was graded and extracted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) evidence-based healthcare center's literature quality appraisal criteria and evidence grading system. Results: Eighteen publications were included, comprising 2 clinical decision tools, 4 guidelines, 5 evidence summaries, 4 systematic reviews, and 3 expert consensus documents. Through professional judgment, 35 best evidence recommendations were ultimately synthesized, covering six aspects: pain assessment tools, non-pharmacological pain management measures, pharmacological interventions, dynamic assessment, and quality improvement measures for pain management. Conclusion: This study summarizes the current best evidence for postoperative pain management in adult ICU patients. It can serve as an evidence-based reference for standardizing pain management practices among ICU healthcare professionals, helping to reduce the incidence of patient pain and related complications, improve patient outcomes, and enhance the quality of nursing care.

Indexed as

adultcritically ill patientsevidence-based nursingpain managementpostoperative

Identifiers

PMID41788417
PMCPMC12958955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.