ReviewEcology and evolution2026
On the Limits of Alpine Plants: A Systematic Review of the Factors Behind Species' Elevational Range Limits.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the factors behind species' range limits is a fundamental objective in ecology. Recent research in alpine plant ecology has moved beyond the classical view that distributions are chiefly shaped by climate and competition. Specifically, broader sets of factors have been taken into account, comprising both biotic factors such as facilitation and herbivory as well as additional abiotic factors such as soil properties. However, an overview of the factors that have been identified and studied as important for elevational range limits of alpine plant species is lacking. In this systematic literature review, we synthesize evidence derived from 107 empirical studies on 226 vascular plant species occurring beyond elevational and latitudinal treelines. We find a persistent research focus on the upper elevational range limit (73% of the studies) and on the role of abiotic factors (54% of the studies), particularly temperature (36% of the studies), whereas research on inter- and intraspecific factors (40% and 25%, respectively), such as herbivory or phenology, remained comparatively rare. While temperature was clearly identified as a major factor influencing the upper range limit (29% of the studies), water availability (15% of the studies) was most commonly studied at the lower range limit. Even though a broad set of factors has been investigated, many potentially important factors remain poorly researched, such as the influence of gene flow and connectivity between populations, phenology and light (each only one or two studies). Our findings highlight the need to move beyond temperature and plant-plant interactions as factors influencing the elevational range limits of alpine plants and to integrate intraspecific (such as gene flow and adaptations) and edaphic factors more fully into future research. Improved methodological standardization and transparency and increased attention on lower range limits will be essential for explaining and predicting alpine plant responses under accelerating environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.