ArticleRSC advances2026
Machine learning driven identification of optimal nanomaterials for efficient pararosaniline dye removal from water using a RFHGB hybrid model.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water pollution by emerging contaminants requires advanced treatment technologies aside from conventional approaches due to the particular threat they pose to environmental and public health. Pararosaniline dye pollutant (PRS) is generally used in textile and biological staining applications, which may result in strong chemical stability, low biodegradability, and high toxicity, making its complete removal from wastewater so difficult. In this study, a ZnO-CuO nanocomposite and SrO photocatalysts were synthesized by experimental means and evaluated for photocatalytic degradation of PRS under controlled conditions. A dataset consisting of 81 experimental observations was computationally expanded to 5000 using synthetic data augmentation. Fifteen machine learning algorithms were trained to predict degradation efficiency, and the top five models were identified based on their performance metrics. Pairwise hybridization of the best five models produced ten hybrid combinations, out of which the Random Forest + HistGradient Boosting hybrid model (RFHGB-hybrid model) demonstrated the highest accuracy and lowest prediction error. The model also provided optimal degradation conditions and catalyst ranking, finding ZnO-CuO to be the best-performing photocatalyst.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.