ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Whole-genome sequencing identifies persistent transmission of a high-risk ST2
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Population Genomics and Machine Learning Reveal a Distinct Regional Genomic Fingerprint of Middle EasternMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome Analysis Reveals Antimicrobial Resistance and Population Structure of Environmental and VeterinaryInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic Diversity and Hospital Circulation of Opportunistic Pathogens in COVID-19 ICUs: Whole-Genome Sequencing Data.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genomic characterization of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: A total of 98 non-repeating clinical isolates of Results: Among the 21 identified STs, ST2 was the dominant lineage, accounting for 66.3% (65/98) of all isolates, indicating the establishment of a predominant epidemic clone. Compared with non-ST2 strains, ST2 isolates exhibited a significantly higher rate of carbapenem resistance (95.38%) and carried a higher burden of resistance determinants, including Discussion: As the first long-term genomic epidemiological study of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.