ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026
Anti-VEGF Agents and the Inner Retina in nAMD: A Narrative Review of RNFL and Ganglion Cell Changes.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the cornerstone of care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), yet its effects on the inner retina are not widely studied. We conducted a narrative review, guided by the SANRA checklist, to map evidence on peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL), macular RNFL, and ganglion cell-derived metrics (GCL/GCIPL/GCC) during anti-VEGF treatment. Major databases were searched from inception to 10 November 2025 for human studies reporting optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements of inner-retinal structure during anti-VEGF treatment. Data were charted for study design, OCT device/segmentation, scan protocol, timing relative to injections, treatment regimen, fluid phenotype (intraretinal fluid [IRF], subretinal fluid [SRF], pigment epithelial detachment [PED]), follow-up interval, and magnitude of change (µm). Across cohorts and agents, global pRNFL thickness was largely stable over weeks to years, with short-term peri-injection fluctuations typically within device test-retest limits. In contrast, macular ganglion cell layers more often showed modest thinning over time, most consistently in eyes with baseline IRF; SRF-predominant disease showed less consistent inner-retinal change. Apparent between-agent differences were small and inconsistent; evidence specific to faricimab remains limited but generally reassuring for structural stability. Overall, most observed changes were often within OCT test-retest variability. In practice, clinicians should prioritise GCL/GCIPL monitoring where IRF is present, interpret small absolute changes against device repeatability, and avoid attributing trivial sectoral shifts to drug toxicity without corroboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.