Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Teacher support and L2 writing engagement in GenAI-integrated classrooms: a serial mediation model of growth mindset and needs satisfaction.

Yanxiao Chen, Jaewoo Shim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanxiao ChenDepartment of English Education, College of Education, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Jaewoo ShimDepartment of English Education, College of Education, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Teacher support is a well-established predictor of L2 writing engagement. However, the mechanisms through which it operates remain insufficiently understood, particularly in classrooms where Generative AI (GenAI) tools are integrated into instruction. Drawing on Self-determination theory (SDT) and Control-value theory (CVT), this study conceptualizes teacher support as the environmental input, growth mindset as a control appraisal, and needs satisfaction as the motivational state closely linked to engagement. Methods: Survey data were collected from 366 Chinese university EFL learners enrolled in GenAI-integrated L2 writing classrooms and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results: Results showed that all three dimensions of teacher support and growth mindset were positively associated with needs satisfaction, and that both growth mindset and needs satisfaction positively predicted L2 writing engagement. Competence support was linked to engagement through separate pathways involving needs satisfaction and growth mindset, as well as through a sequential growth-mindset → needs-satisfaction mechanism. Emotional and autonomy support showed significant direct associations with engagement and indirect effects via needs satisfaction. Discussion: These findings provide initial evidence for an SDT-CVT-aligned process, in which higher levels of teacher support are associated with higher engagement through appraisal-driven motivational states within GenAI-integrated instructional contexts. This offers practical guidance for sustaining learner engagement in GenAI-integrated L2 writing.

Indexed as

GenAI-integrated classroomsgrowth mindsetL2 writing engagementneeds satisfactionteacher support

Identifiers

PMID41788269
PMCPMC12957267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.