Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788261›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Computational thinking as a mediator between modeling self-efficacy and flexible thinking in pre-service science teachers.

Rumeysa Beyazhancer, Salih Cepni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rumeysa BeyazhancerDepartment of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Salih CepniDepartment of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In psychology, constructs such as self-efficacy, cognitive flexibility, and computational thinking (CT) are recognized as mechanisms that explain how individuals adapt to uncertainty and complexity. Self-efficacy regulates both motivation and cognition, while flexible thinking reflects the adaptive capacity to generate alternatives and cope with ambiguity. CT extends beyond technical domains as a cognitive framework that structures processes such as abstraction and reasoning. This study explores the mediating role of CT in the relationship between mathematical modeling self-efficacy and flexible thinking among pre-service science teachers. Methods: Participants were 244 pre-service science teachers from two state universities in Türkiye. Data were gathered using the Mathematical Modeling Self-Efficacy Scale, the Computational Thinking Skills Scale, and the Flexible Thinking in Learning Scale. Confirmatory factor analyses supported validity and reliability. PROCESS Macro (Model 4) tested mediation with controls for gender and grade. Results: Modeling self-efficacy significantly predicted CT ( Discussion and conclusion: Findings indicate that self-efficacy beliefs influence adaptive cognitive capacities both directly and indirectly through CT. CT functions as a psychological bridge, linking self-efficacy with flexible thinking, and highlights the importance of integrating these constructs in educational psychology to foster resilience, adaptability, and coping with complexity.

Indexed as

computational thinkingflexible thinkingmathematical modeling self-efficacymediation analysispre-service science teachers

Identifiers

PMID41788261
PMCPMC12957265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.