ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The SPHERE model: Social Prescribing and Health Equity through Responsive Evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building and evaluating a social prescribing program for carer-employees: an intervention study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social prescribing has emerged as a promising approach to improve health and advance health equity by connecting individuals to non-clinical services that address social determinants of health, such as housing, food access, legal aid, and community-based supports. While referral pathways and link worker roles have received significant attention, far less focus has been given to the public policies that govern access to these services. The success and sustainability of social prescribing efforts depend on whether these enabling policies are well-implemented, community-responsive, and rigorously evaluated, yet few models exist to guide this work. The SPHERE model-Social Prescribing and Health Equity through Responsive Evaluation-addresses this gap. Drawing from implementation science, evaluation theory, and health equity-centered design, SPHERE extends existing implementation frameworks by focusing on how public policies themselves function as implementation infrastructure for social prescribing. The model was refined through considering policy examples and aligning with operational realities of cross-sector, referral-based health systems. SPHERE consists of eight interrelated components: (i) Policy Foundation; (ii) Implementation Infrastructure; (iii) Community Engagement and Co-Production; (iv) Contextual Assessment; (v) Implementation Strategies; (vi) Process Measures; (vii) Outcome Measures; and (viii) Feedback Loops and Learning Mechanisms. These components are grounded in health equity principles and designed to support adaptive and accountable policy delivery. This article illustrates the model's relevance through three examples of policies that enable social prescribing: Housing First initiatives, Medicaid reentry provisions, and local food policy councils. SPHERE positions policy as a critical, actionable driver of social prescribing systems, helping ensure enabling policies are not only enacted but implemented in community-responsive ways. By integrating SPHERE into the design, implementation, and evaluation of policies that enable social prescribing, governments and communities can transform referral systems into adaptive, health equity-driven platforms for structural change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.