Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788211›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Enclosure enhances grassland plant diversity and community stability more effectively than grazing and mowing by strengthening species turnover regulation and soil process driving.

Mengyuan Shi, Tianqi Yu, Sisi Chen, Chu Zhang, Xiaoping Xin, Senya He, Fanglin Liu, Li Ji, Ying Li, Xiaotian Gao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mengyuan ShiState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianqi YuState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sisi ChenState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoping XinState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Senya HeState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fanglin LiuState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Li JiState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ying LiState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaotian GaoState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ruirui YanState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grassland ecosystems are profoundly influenced by land management practices, yet the long-term mechanisms linking plant diversity and community stability remain unclear. In this study, we conducted three-year observational study to assess how enclosure, grazing, and mowing affect plant community dynamics through species turnover, niche overlap, and environmental drivers in the Hulunbuir temperate meadow steppe of Inner Mongolia. Using 198 permanent quadrats monitored over three consecutive growing seasons, we quantified α-, β-, and γ-diversity and assessed stability via biomass variability. Enclosure was associated with higher species richness and lower biomass variability, suggesting enhanced community stability under reduced disturbance, whereas grazing was associated with lower species richness and greater temporal and spatial variability in community structure, potentially linked to intensified species turnover and soil compaction. Mowing generally showed intermediate patterns, reflecting moderate alteration of competitive dynamics and community composition. Our analyses further revealed that soil physical properties and nutrient availability-particularly soil bulk density(SBD), total nitrogen (TN), and organic carbon (OC)-were key environmental factors associated with variation in plant diversity and stability across management regimes. Structural equation modelling based on observational data indicated that these environmental factors may influence diversity and stability both directly and indirectly, with pathways differing among management types. Our findings indicate that grassland management practices modulate diversity-stability relationships in a management-dependent manner, likely through their effects on species turnover, niche structure, and soil-plant feedbacks. These results highlight the importance of context-specific management strategies for sustaining grassland stability under ongoing environmental change. temperate meadow steppe; plant diversity; community stability; enclosure; grazing; mowing; environmental factor drivers.

Indexed as

community stabilityenclosureenvironmental factor driversgrazingmowingplant diversitytemperate meadow steppe

Identifiers

PMID41788211
PMCPMC12956662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.