Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Cotton boll extraction and single-boll weight estimation based on UAV multispectral imagery.

Maoguang Chen, Caixia Yin, Na Su, Tao Lin, Xiuliang Jin, Fengquan Wu, Pingan Jiang, Qiuxiang Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maoguang ChenEngineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education/College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Caixia YinEngineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education/College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Na SuEngineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education/College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Tao LinInstitute of Cash Crops, Xinjiang Academy Sciences, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Desert Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Urumqi, China.
Xiuliang JinKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing, China.
Fengquan WuEngineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education/College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Pingan JiangEngineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education/College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Qiuxiang TangEngineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education/College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-boll weight (SBW) is difficult to estimate after defoliant application because canopy spectra include numerous mixed pixels from lint, soil, and senescent leaves, leading to strong background interference. Here we propose a UAV multispectral workflow that combines object-based boll extraction, spectral feature selection, and machine-learning regression to improve SBW mapping. Data were collected from a two-year drip-irrigated cotton experiment in Xinjiang, China involving four varieties evaluated under five planting densities treatments. Boll extraction was treated as a supervised object-based classification problem, and maximum likelihood, mahalanobis distance, and parallelepiped classifiers were compared. Fifteen vegetation indices were computed from the extracted boll pixels; informative features were identified using Pearson correlation and SHapley Additive exPlanations importance ranking. SBW was then estimated with ridge regression, random forest regression, and neural network regression using an independent validation dataset. Maximum likelihood consistently achieved overall accuracy above 97% with Kappa values above 0.93, outperforming the other classifiers. Indices derived from the red, red-edge, and near-infrared bands, particularly those designed to reduce soil background effects, showed the strongest relationships with SBW and ranked highest in SHAP. The best-performing model, which integrated maximum likelihood-based boll extraction with neural network regression, achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.80 and a root mean square error of 0.31 g on the validation set. Relative errors remained below 15% across different years, varieties, and planting densities. This workflow reduces background interference and enables transferable SBW spatial estimation for breeding evaluation and density and harvest management.

Indexed as

cottoncotton boll extractionmultispectral imagerysingle-boll weightunmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

Identifiers

PMID41788210
PMCPMC12957228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.