ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Physiological-immune resilience risk assessment model for predicting adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse cardiac events have been identified as a major determinant of poor prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), directly increasing mortality risk. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a physio-immune resilience risk assessment model to identify, at an early stage, the influencing factors of adverse cardiac outcomes in AMI patients, thereby providing clinical guidance for subsequent interventions. Methods: A total of 345 patients diagnosed with AMI between August 2022 and March 2024 were prospectively enrolled. The occurrence of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was independently assessed by two cardiology specialists, and participants were categorized into a MACE group and a non-MACE group accordingly. Clinical data and laboratory findings were compared between groups. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression were applied to determine the influencing factors of adverse cardiac outcomes. Furthermore, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of the physio-immune resilience model for MACE in AMI patients. Results: The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the MACE group was significantly lower than that in the non-MACE group, whereas high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were markedly higher ( Conclusion: Patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain at risk of adverse cardiac outcomes, which may be associated with the physiological resilience score, hs-CRP, SII, and SIRI. These indicators demonstrate substantial predictive value for 30-day MACE in AMI patients. Accordingly, early clinical interventions targeting these risk factors are recommended to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac outcomes and improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.