ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Predicting Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of a Comprehensive Clinical Prediction Model.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive machine learning (ML)-based prediction model for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (IHCP) by integrating multi-modal data including demographic characteristics, laboratory biochemical indicators, and ultrasonic echocardiographic parameters. The model was designed to stratify ICP severity and remain applicable in settings lacking total bile acid (TBA) testing, which addresses current diagnostic gaps and may support the reduction of adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 750 pregnant women (525 in training, 225 in testing) between July 2020 and October 2023 from the Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture was recruited for the study. Seven ML algorithms (Logistic regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest [RF], Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], Regularized Support Vector Machine [RSVM], Multilayer Perceptron [MLP], and Elastic Net [ENET]). Results: The RF model exhibited superior performance, achieving ROC-AUC of 0.90 (training) and 0.86 (testing), with sensitivity and specificity both ≥0.93 in the testing cohort. Key predictors included pruritus, TBA, glycocholic acid, alkaline phosphatase, and ultrasonic indicators (ventricular wall mean thickness, myocardial echogenicity). Notably, the model retained efficacy without TBA, maintaining precision ≥0.75 across recall values of 0.6-0.9. Conclusion: The multi-modal RF model effectively predicts IHCP, enables severity stratification, and enhances accessibility in resource-limited settings, providing valuable support for targeted clinical interventions and may support the reduction of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.