ReviewCureus2026
Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: A Narrative Review of Techniques, Safety, and Clinical Applications.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Anatomical Mechanisms Underlying Clinically Reported Complications of the Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-guided cranial multifidus cervicis plane block in dogs: a cadaveric study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Alberta family integrated careFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) has changed how we manage pain by allowing doctors to visualize nerves and other structures in real time, making the process more accurate, effective, and safe while also reducing risk. This narrative review examines the latest advancements in UGRA techniques, evaluating their efficacy and safety, particularly for peripheral nerve and truncal plane blocks, their potential to diminish opioid consumption, and their clinical applications in perioperative care. This review followed the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) quality assessment guidelines and searched six databases for studies published from January 2015 to October 2025, including trials, meta-analyses, cohort studies, reviews, and technical reports. This review aims to give doctors, anesthesia experts, and researchers the newest information and methods about UGRA, focusing on better ways to see needles and use additives like dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine to make regional anesthesia more effective and last longer, which can help lower opioid use and speed up recovery after surgery, while ultrasound guidance makes these techniques safer and more accurate. Another important finding is that real-time imaging and protocols help reduce safety concerns like toxicity, nerve damage, and infection. Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in UGRA enhance precision, safety, and recovery, paving the way for further standardization and accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.