ArticleCureus2026
Intraoperative Methadone for Post-craniotomy Pain Control: A Matched Cohort Exploratory Framework Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain following craniotomy is commonly treated with multimodal analgesic regimens requiring frequent dosing, which contributes to an increased opioid burden. Methadone, a μ-opioid receptor agonist and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, may provide extended analgesia in craniotomy patients from a single intraoperative dose. Methods We performed a single-center feasibility retrospective matched cohort study of adult patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection between October 2024 and March 2025. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Results Thirty-two patients (eight methadone, 24 controls) were analyzed. Baseline demographics and perioperative characteristics were comparable. At 24 hours, pain scores and opioid use were similar between groups. At 48 and 72 hours, the methadone group demonstrated numerically lower pain scores and opioid consumption, though the study was underpowered to interpret these differences. No methadone-associated safety concerns were identified. Conclusions Intraoperative methadone was feasible and appeared comparable to conventional opioid regimens, with trends toward reduced pain and opioid use at later timepoints. These exploratory findings support further prospective trials to clarify the role of methadone in neurosurgical analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.