ArticleCureus2026
Reframing Clinical Research in Latin America: Implications of Underrepresentation for Health Systems and Global Evidence.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although Latin America represents a substantial share of the global population and bears a significant and growing disease burden, the region remains underrepresented in global clinical research relative to its scale. This imbalance is associated with limited generation of locally relevant evidence and may influence the pace of evidence uptake, health system learning, and patient access to innovative medicines, devices, and technologies. Available analyses suggest that barriers to research participation in the region are predominantly structural, including chronic underinvestment, regulatory fragmentation, misaligned incentives, institutional constraints, and limitations related to health system scale, rather than intrinsic deficiencies in clinical or scientific capacity. Comparative regional evidence indicates that research activity varies according to governance models, regulatory alignment, and system organization, supporting the view that underrepresentation reflects modifiable system-level factors. Framing clinical research as a core health system function may strengthen healthcare performance in Latin America while enhancing the relevance, diversity, and equity of the global biomedical evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.