Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788077›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026

A multi-layered burden or a right fit? Physicians' perspectives on multidose drug dispensing in Denmark.

Stine Søndersted Clausen, Cille Bülow, Tina Drud Due, Kirsten Høj, Anette Vik Jøsendal, Mette Bech Risør, Frans Boch Waldorff, Sofie Rosenlund Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stine Søndersted ClausenSection of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1356-1053
Cille BülowDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6736-9601
Tina Drud DueThe Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7483-8223
Kirsten HøjResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6591-0548
Anette Vik JøsendalNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-5049
Mette Bech RisørSection of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-5804
Frans Boch WaldorffSection of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7859-633X
Sofie Rosenlund LauSection of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3377-4566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultidose drug dispensing (MDD) provides machine-packed, patient-specific dose pouches to improve medication safety and adherence, streamline medication management, and reduce pressure on healthcare systems. Despite the benefits, uptake in Denmark remains lower than in neighbouring countries, even after MDD prescriptions were integrated into the national electronic Shared Medication Record (SMR). This study explores general practitioners' (GPs) and hospital physicians' experiences with MDD following SMR integration.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 15 physicians (8 GPs, 7 hospital physicians) from the Capital Region and the North Region in Denmark between November 2022 and May 2023. Data was analysed using systematic text condensation.

resultsTwo main code groups with six subgroups were constructed. "A Multi-layered Burden for Physicians", reflects an experience of an increased workload and added complexity resulting from IT challenges, dosing period calculations, and inconsistent communication with pharmacies. "Finding the Right Fit", highlights uncertainty about which patients and medications are suitable for MDD, together with the differentiated roles of healthcare professionals in managing the MDD system. While some physicians considered MDD beneficial for patients with complex needs, others found it unsuitable for those with fluctuating conditions, especially during hospitalisations.

conclusionAlthough MDD offers potential benefits, its practical implementation is constrained by digital, organisational, and interprofessional challenges. Assessing patient suitability is essential, but rather than excluding patients, the findings suggest reconceptualising MDD as a flexible, adaptable system, capable of meeting individual care needs and responding to changing clinical situations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'DenmarkDrug PrescriptionsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchWorkloadcare transitionsinterprofessional collaborationmedication managementMultidose drug dispensing (MDD)primary careShared Medication Record (SMR)

Identifiers

PMID41788077
PMCPMC12973786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.