ArticleBone & joint open2026
Poor predictive performance of early outcome models following lumbar disc herniation surgery.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to assess the preoperative predictors of individual outcomes after surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using patients treated from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2019 at a single hospital. We included patients aged between 18 and 65 years who underwent surgery for the first time for a specific level of herniation, where surgery consisted of lumbar discectomy or sequestrectomy. Fusion or central decompression procedures were excluded. Data were collected from electronic patient registries and paper questionnaires, when available. The study outcomes included postoperative emergency department visits, readmission, length of stay, postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score after four weeks, additional surgery due to reherniation within 60 days, and postoperative infection. Logistic and ordinal regression analyses were used to develop a predictive model. Results: The data included 882 patients, with a mean age of 41 years, and 56% of whom were male. The model for the length of stay showed the best performance parameters with a moderate fit (pseudo-R Conclusion: Length of stay in hospital after LDH surgery was best explained by emergency surgery and surgery on multiple intervertebral discs. The models created were moderate at best, and future research with larger datasets is needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.