ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026
Contemporary Clinical Practices in Anticoagulation Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Europe-Wide Survey.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesClinical practice in anticoagulation management, particularly in heparin administration, monitoring, reversal and haemostasis, is known to differ significantly. To better characterize this variability, we conducted a Europe-wide survey aimed at mapping current practices, identifying areas of consensus and divergence and guiding future research and standardization efforts.
methodsA 27-question electronic questionnaire was designed by an expert panel and distributed across European cardiac surgery centres with a snowball sampling method. Results were examined via descriptive statistics, with categorical variables shown as percentages and 95% CIs.
resultsA total of 114 centres from 29 countries completed the questionnaire between February and April 2025. Most centres were high-volume institutions (>500 cases/year, 59.6%) and reported the use of written heparinization protocols (78.1%)-initial heparin dose of 300 IU/kg in 61.4%. Many used normothermic perfusion (52.6%). Pre-cardiopulmonary bypass activated clotting time (ACT) targets varied from 400 s (41.2%) to 480 s (38.6%). There was significant heterogeneity in reversal practices: heparin: protamine ratios were 1:1 in 57.0%, <1:1 in 36.8%, and >1:1 in 6.1%. Universal post-reversal ACT target was absent in 70.2%, with 78.1% using an ACT value close to baseline. Although almost all centres (90.4%) had viscoelastic testing, clinical criteria alone were used in 48.2% to guide transfusion decisions. Only 83.3% of centres had any explicit protocol for managing high-bleeding-risk patients.
conclusionsWhile essential heparinization practices demonstrate consensus across Europe, heterogeneity exists in anticoagulation reversal strategies and haemostasis monitoring. However, significant variability remains in protamine dosing, post-reversal monitoring, and the use of viscoelastic assays, representing an opportunity to optimize patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.