Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787726›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2026

No Evidence of Impact of Genetic Sex on Hyperthermia-Induced Neural Tube Defects in Chicken Embryos.

Yiting Wang, Aimee K Ryan, Anna K Naumova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiting WangDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Aimee K RyanDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-1324
Anna K NaumovaDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-5765

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn mammals, cranial neural tube defects (NTDs) are more likely to occur in females. It has been proposed that the sex bias in NTDs was due to the presence of the inactive X chromosome in the somatic cells of female embryos and that the inactive X acted as a heterochromatic sink, competing for silencing factors with the rest of the genome. Such competition increased the likelihood of abnormal gene regulation. To test this hypothesis, we used an animal model that lacks dosage compensation, the chicken Gallus gallus. If the heterochromatic sink hypothesis was correct, no sex bias will be found in chicken embryos with cranial NTDs.

methodsWe used in ovo heat treatment to induce NTDs in chicken embryos and PCR genotyping to determine embryos' genetic sex. Embryo phenotypes were examined using a dissecting microscope. Embryos were staged according to Hamburger and Hamilton criteria and scored for NTDs.

resultsWe observed a statistically significant increase in NTDs following heat treatment (38.1% in the treatment group vs. 5.9% in the control group), but no sex bias. Next, we asked if heat treatment led to a developmental delay and found a significant association between the numbers of somite pairs and heat treatment and a reduced number of somites in the chicken embryos with cranial NTDs.

conclusionIn ovo hyperthermia during the developmental window when the neural tube is formed dramatically increases the rate of NTDs and delays the development of chicken embryos. However, there is no sex bias with respect to NTD risk.

Indexed as

HyperthermiaNeural Tube DefectsAnimalsChick EmbryoChickensFemaleMaleNeural Tubechicken embryohyperthermianeural tube defectsneural tube developmentPCR genotypingsex bias

Identifiers

PMID41787726
PMCPMC12963691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.