ArticleArthritis care & research2026
Formal and Informal Social Care in People With Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Survey.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are leading causes of physical disability, necessitating support with activities of daily living. This study describes social care received by patients with RMDs in two disparate regions of England: Salford (urban) and Norfolk (rural).
methodsA cross-sectional survey identified how many patients received care and who provided it as well as care type (formal/informal), frequency, and duration. Participants included (1) patients attending rheumatology outpatient facilities at Salford Royal Hospital and (2) participants with inflammatory polyarthritis enrolled in the Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR). Descriptive statistics compared the care received, and a logistic regression model investigated factors associated with receiving help.
resultsThe Salford cohort was younger and had a wider range of RMDs compared with NOAR. A significant number of participants in the Salford (85%) and NOAR (38%) groups required help with daily activities. Of those needing help, 61% and 73% received care in Salford and NOAR, respectively, predominantly informally from family and friends. Local authorities delivered social care to just 0.5% of Salford and 1.4% of NOAR participants. Daily care was provided to 43% of Salford and 53% of NOAR participants. Weekly care duration varied: 21% of Salford and 31% of NOAR responders received ≤4 hours, and 19% of Salford and 10% of NOAR responders received >20 hours. Having multiple conditions increased the likelihood of receiving care: Salford odds ratio 1.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-3.18) and NOAR odds ratio 3.30 (95% CI 1.45-7.60).
conclusionThe survey highlights a lack of formal care for patients with RMDs, who mostly rely on undocumented informal care. Patients with multiple conditions often require daily living assistance; rheumatology services should consider incorporating social care reviews as part of routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.