ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026
Prediction of dumping after oesophageal cancer surgery.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDumping syndrome is a common consequence following oesophagectomy and may lead to reduced food intake, resulting in subsequent weight loss, and negatively impact health-related quality of life. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to facilitate preventive treatment planning by identifying individuals at an increased risk of developing dumping syndrome. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were obtained from a nationwide, population-based cohort of patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer between 2013 and 2020. Patient and clinical characteristics were retrieved from national health registries and medical records. Dumping symptoms were self-reported 1 year after surgery. Multivariable regression models provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsAmong the 384 individuals, 41 (11%) developed significant symptoms of dumping. The following variables that increased the probability of developing dumping were included in the final prediction model: younger age, female sex, higher preoperative body mass index, no neoadjuvant therapy, Charlson Comorbidity Index score > 0, open oesophagectomy, cervical anastomosis, and less severe postoperative complications (lower Clavien Dindo grade). For the prediction of early dumping symptoms, the AUC for the total cohort was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.83) and after cross-validation, 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53-0.72). For early and late symptoms, the AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.83), and for the cross-validated model, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.74).
interpretationThis study offers insights into factors associated with dumping syndrome after oesophagectomy. The prediction model showed modest ability to distinguish between high and low-risk patients, and should therefore be interpreted as supportive rather than definitive. Its potential value lies in complementing clinical judgement, informing structured follow-up and guiding future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.