ArticleBMC psychology2026
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a parental mediation scale for children's digital gaming in a Chinese parent sample.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Chinese version of the Digital Play Parental Mediation Scale of Children's Digital Game Use within a sample of Chinese parents.
methodsThe study use 995 valid responses retained for analysis. The Parenting Styles Scale, Parent-Child Attachment Scale, and Short‑Form Video Addiction Scale were used as validity criteria. After a three‑week interval, 237 parents were randomly selected for retest to examine temporal stability.
resultsExploratory factor analysis supported a four‑factor structure, accounting for 73.69% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable structural validity (CFI = 0.89, TLI = 0.88, SRMR = 0.07, RMSEA = 0.07). The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.7) and test-retest reliability (r > 0.7). Moreover, measurement invariance across gender groups was established.
conclusionThe Chinese version of the Digital Parental Play Mediation Scale shows satisfactory reliability and validity among Chinese parents. It can be used to assess parental mediation behaviors in the context of children's digital gaming and allows for meaningful comparisons across genders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.