Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787586›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2026

Cost of an Audit and Feedback intervention to increase uptake of maternal and child health services in Mozambique's Primary health care.

Ermyas Birru, Aneth Dinis, Jonny Crocker, Quinhas Fernandes, Sarah Gimbel, Steve Gloyd, Artur Gremu, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Isaías Ramiro, Stelio Tembe and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ermyas BirruDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. ermyab@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9393-2533
Aneth DinisDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jonny CrockerGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Quinhas FernandesNational Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo City, Mozambique.
Sarah GimbelDepartment of Child, Family & Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Steve GloydDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Artur GremuComité Para Saúde de Moçambique, Chimoio, Mozambique.
Lisa R HirschhornDepartment of Medical Social Sciences and Robert J Havey Institute for Global Health - Ryan, Family Center for Global Primary Care, Feinberg School of Medicine , Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Isaías RamiroComité Para Saúde de Moçambique, Chimoio, Mozambique.
Stelio TembeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Orvalho AugustoDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kenneth SherrDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Spreading the Integrated District Evidence-to-Action Program for Neonatal Mortality Reduction (IDEAs) in MozambiqueR01HD092449 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FERNANDES, QUINHAS, SHERR, KENNETH · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2016106Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1R01HD092449-01A1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite high coverage of facility-based maternal and child health (MCH) services in Mozambique, preventable maternal and neonatal deaths remain among the highest globally. To address this, the Integrated District Evidence-to-Action (IDEAs) program was implemented from 2016 to 2020 in central Mozambique as a facility-level Audit and Feedback (A&F) strategy. IDEAs adapted traditional A&F into three components: 1) biannual facility readiness assessments, 2) A&F meetings to develop action plans, and 3) supportive supervision with funding for implementation. This study estimates total and component-specific implementation costs of IDEAs and compares them to average district health budgets.

methodsCosts were estimated from a payer perspective following CHEERS guidelines, using both Gross and Microcosting methods. Costs were annualized over five years (2016-2020) with a 3% discount rate and are reported in 2020 USD. Staff time estimates were based on program staff consultations and national salary data. Outcomes include average cost per district and total annual cost by intervention component. We conducted a deterministic sensitivity analysis to identify cost drivers with the most significant impact on the overall cost.

resultsThe IDEAs programs total (2016-2020) incurred total costs were $2,224,341 (2020 USD), with $1,702,648 (76.5%) for recurrent expenses and $495,323 (22.3%) for Capital expenses. Average annual district-level costs were $41,967, including A&F meetings ($10,893; 26.0%), Capital expenditures ($8255; 19.7%), targeted support ($9323; 22.2%) which includes $5700 (13.6%) for district-level cash transfers and $3623 (8.6%) for facility supervision, and readiness assessments ($6351; 15.1%).Per diems accounted for 52.0% of A&F meeting costs. IDEAs represented approximately 6.6% of the average district health budget. Implementation involved 33 participants with 2560 h yearly per district. Capital expenses were highly sensitive to when applying a standard 25% increase or decrease compared to other cost categories.

conclusionOur findings offer practical guidance for district-level planners to adapt and scale IDEAs. Policymakers and donors should integrate recurring costs into budgets and explore cost-saving strategies like virtual tools or streamlined meetings to improve sustainability. Future research must assess long-term integration into government programs and test alternative approaches across diverse low-resource settings to guide scaling.

Indexed as

Audit and FeedbackGlobal HealthHealth Systems ResearchImplementation CostImplementation StrategiesMozambiquePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID41787586
PMCPMC13088376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.