Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787510›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2026

Plasma proteomic and machine learning models for differentiating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: findings from a prospective cohort.

Chen-Shiou Wu, De-Wei Lai, Yi-Ching Chen, Yi-Hsuan Yu, Lan-Yan Yang, Pin-Kuei Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chen-Shiou WuDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard, Sect. 4, Taichung, 407219, Taiwan.
De-Wei LaiDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard, Sect. 4, Taichung, 407219, Taiwan.
Yi-Ching ChenDivision of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, 407219, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsuan YuIntegrated Care Center of Interstitial Lung Disease, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, 407219, Taiwan.
Lan-Yan Yang *Division of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, 407219, Taiwan.
Pin-Kuei Fu *Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard, Sect. 4, Taichung, 407219, Taiwan. yetquen@gmail.com.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan NSTC 112-2314-B-075A-003-MY3Taichung Veterans General Hospital TCVGH-1143909D; TCVGH-1114401CTaichung Veterans General Hospital TCVGH-1143910BTaichung Veterans General Hospital TVGH-1143916C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Differentiating IPF from connective tissue disease–associated ILD (CTD-ILD) is clinically challenging due to overlapping features, and reliable circulating biomarkers are lacking. Recent studies suggest that multi-marker proteomic models combined with machine learning may enhance diagnostic precision and prognostic assessment in fibrotic ILDs.

methodsWe prospectively analyzed plasma samples from Taiwanese patients with fibrotic ILDs (IPF, n = 22; CTD-ILD, n = 66) using the Olink inflammation panel (92 proteins). Differentially expressed proteins were identified and subjected to integrative network analyses. Predictive classification models were developed using generalized linear modeling (GLM), decision tree, and random forest approaches. Prognostic relevance was evaluated with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses, and findings were validated in public transcriptomic datasets.

resultsAmong 92 proteins profiled, 23 showed significant differences between IPF and CTD-ILD. Four candidates—MMP-10, FGF-19, ADA, and TWEAK (TNFSF12)—consistently emerged as key discriminatory markers. The GLM model incorporating FGF-19, ADA, and TWEAK achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.870; sensitivity 0.97; specificity 0.82), outperforming decision tree and random forest models. Transcriptomic validation confirmed TWEAK downregulation in ILD lung tissues and in TGF-β1–stimulated fibroblasts, linking it to canonical profibrotic signaling. Survival analysis showed significantly worse outcomes in IPF versus CTD-ILD (log-rank p < 0.001), with MMP-10 associated with poor prognosis (HR 2.08, p = 0.007) and TWEAK with favorable prognosis (HR 0.04, p < 0.001).

conclusionsThis study identifies distinct plasma proteomic signatures that differentiate IPF from CTD-ILD and highlights TWEAK as both a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. A multi-marker GLM model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, supporting the clinical utility of plasma proteomics combined with machine learning to improve disease classification and risk stratification in fibrotic ILDs. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Integrating plasma proteomics with machine learning enables development of a multi-marker model that enhances diagnostic accuracy and prognostic evaluation in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases, supporting more precise disease classification and risk stratification in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Connective Tissue DiseasesIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung Diseases, InterstitialMachine LearningProteomicsAgedBiomarkersCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesBiomarkersConnective tissue disease–associated interstitial lung diseaseIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisMachine learningMulti-marker predictive modelsPlasma proteomicsTWEAK

Identifiers

PMID41787510
PMCPMC13078024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.