ArticleRespiratory research2026
Plasma proteomic and machine learning models for differentiating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: findings from a prospective cohort.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Initial Dosage Optimization of Tacrolimus in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Patients: An Exploratory Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Differentiating IPF from connective tissue disease–associated ILD (CTD-ILD) is clinically challenging due to overlapping features, and reliable circulating biomarkers are lacking. Recent studies suggest that multi-marker proteomic models combined with machine learning may enhance diagnostic precision and prognostic assessment in fibrotic ILDs.
methodsWe prospectively analyzed plasma samples from Taiwanese patients with fibrotic ILDs (IPF, n = 22; CTD-ILD, n = 66) using the Olink inflammation panel (92 proteins). Differentially expressed proteins were identified and subjected to integrative network analyses. Predictive classification models were developed using generalized linear modeling (GLM), decision tree, and random forest approaches. Prognostic relevance was evaluated with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses, and findings were validated in public transcriptomic datasets.
resultsAmong 92 proteins profiled, 23 showed significant differences between IPF and CTD-ILD. Four candidates—MMP-10, FGF-19, ADA, and TWEAK (TNFSF12)—consistently emerged as key discriminatory markers. The GLM model incorporating FGF-19, ADA, and TWEAK achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.870; sensitivity 0.97; specificity 0.82), outperforming decision tree and random forest models. Transcriptomic validation confirmed TWEAK downregulation in ILD lung tissues and in TGF-β1–stimulated fibroblasts, linking it to canonical profibrotic signaling. Survival analysis showed significantly worse outcomes in IPF versus CTD-ILD (log-rank p < 0.001), with MMP-10 associated with poor prognosis (HR 2.08, p = 0.007) and TWEAK with favorable prognosis (HR 0.04, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study identifies distinct plasma proteomic signatures that differentiate IPF from CTD-ILD and highlights TWEAK as both a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. A multi-marker GLM model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, supporting the clinical utility of plasma proteomics combined with machine learning to improve disease classification and risk stratification in fibrotic ILDs. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Integrating plasma proteomics with machine learning enables development of a multi-marker model that enhances diagnostic accuracy and prognostic evaluation in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases, supporting more precise disease classification and risk stratification in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.