ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Proteomic profiling of colorectal liver metastases reveals histopathological response-specific molecular signatures of chemotherapy efficacy.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemoresistance in treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) poses a major challenge in preventing disease relapse, with up to 80% of patients developing drug resistance over the course of treatment. Proteomic signatures of responsive vs. non-responsive metastases can provide insights into functional expression patterns, potentially identifying biomarkers for therapy efficacy.
methodsA total of 33 CRLM tissue samples from 31 patients were subjected to histopathological and proteomic analysis. The patients were included in the study after undergoing preoperative treatment (n = 28), including platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 19), non-platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 8), as well as targeted therapies (n = 20), or without preoperative therapy (n = 5). Based on Rubbia-Brandt criteria and vital tumor cell percentage, CRLM were categorized to major (MR), partial (PR) and no response (NR) groups. Proteomic analysis was conducted using label-free mass spectrometry (LFQ-MS), followed by clustering according to histological response and distinct treatment regimens.
resultsProteomic analysis revealed significant differential protein expression of 607 proteins linked to distinct histopathological response types. CRLM responsive to chemotherapy displayed marked enrichment (p ≤ 0.01) in pathways associated with immune infiltration, ECM matrix organization, the complement system, and apolipoprotein-associated processes, indicative of distinct stromal and immune invasion patterns with multimodal importance of cell adhesion proteins. In contrast, attenuated expression of proteins enriched in pathways of mitochondrial translation initiation, elongation and termination was detectable.
conclusionCRLM exhibited distinct proteomic phenotypes based on their histopathological response to preoperative systemic therapy largely independent of chemotherapy regimens. This proteomic profiling establishes a foundation for identifying critical biomarker profiles by nominating protein markers for major chemotherapy response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.